Francesco Pretto
Francesco Pretto
After a big `PdfEncrypt` rework I can confirm this is fixed and tested as well. It was related to https://github.com/podofo/podofo/issues/176. https://github.com/podofo/podofo/commit/fcb42be7a1c9f8d7d9060d4050620c56890ff047 https://github.com/podofo/podofo/commit/e001f684364819e174d702aad080a92245af4f30
Closing this as there are more analyses/test fixture in #242 , and the request is basically the same. A resolution is still pending.
> add "-fpermissive" to CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS in CMakeLists.txt. > Or it will complains "__builtin_is_constant_evaluated is not delcared", introduced by source file > "podofo/3rdparty/numerics/safe_conversions.h". `__builtin_is_constant_evaluated` is [documented](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#index-_005f_005fbuiltin_005fis_005fconstant_005fevaluated), and also it appears to...
Almost for sure you are picking an old gcc 8.x compiler, see the test on [Wandbox](https://wandbox.org/permlink/Hw286gaZXokTA9Z5). If you want to produce a patch to support gcc 8.x you are very...
Sorry, I don't want to maintain tools right now. And this really mean I should not merge PRs for tools until we understand what to do with them. As a...
With PoDoFo-next (soon 0.10). Don't expect new tools now because all tools are currently unsupported. An API it's more interesting. I write some ideas about a possible API: ``` PdfAnnotation::Remove()...
Typography is indeed a complex topic, and pdfmm still doesn't offer any improvements here. Much effort has been put into into supporting generic Unicode encodings/strings, but it's not same thing...
> Direct API usage is not possible due to character set conversion and line endings handling I'm not 100% I understand what you mean but at least for paths I...
Also `basic_fstream` has a similar extension: https://github.com/microsoft/STL/blob/ad80eb79ba4953e7529d15b1bc8d0b540150bf7d/stl/inc/fstream#L1227 That signature would be safe to preserve as the internal buffer of a fstream can be polymorphic. I believe dropping the `basic_filebuf` constructor...
> It seemly introduces additional indirections to use `FILE*` [...] I'm curious about whether it's possible to "inline" that structure into filebuf I don't know the internal structure of `FILE*`...