Monica Cellio

Since this issue was filed, we've modified the flag interface to notice if you have a pending flag and ask if you want to flag again. So half the work...

Requesting input from @luap42 , @ArtOfCode- , @trichoplax , @Oaphi . (Input welcome from anyone else!)

From discussion on Discord: let's simplify: X% of good events within the last N events (two values to set rather than four), defer time constraints. We're only looking at resolved...

@ArtOfCode- four years ago when the code was pretty different from today, you marked this as hard. Is that still your assessment today?

If we had the concept of a rollback (possibly related: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/1144), then one way to approach it might be to apply the edit in some "pending" state, and then either...

Thanks for the report, and do feel free to ignore the warning until we can fix it. (You can still post; it's just annoying to get a misdirected warning.)

> Note: this only applies to rejected suggested edits from what I can tell I think it applies to all resolved suggested edits that are not the most recent edit....

> I think there might be two schools of thought on this. On one hand, comparing to the revision that was edited is most faithful to the changes that were...

> I don't think it does - do you have a reproducible example for this one? The controller's `approve` method addresses this problem specifically - it's only the `reject` method...

@Oaphi: does the fix only apply to new edits (works going forward), or did we expect old suggested edits like the one in the description to now behave differently?