CeDeROM
CeDeROM
Thanks @jerpelea my all remarks are above already, text proposition too :-) My main concern was about not only changing breaking change mark but also process (i.e. no mark in...
It sounds like when breaking change is provided, PR should only contain breaking change and nothing more, it should pass build, but should not contain any additional features or updates,...
Don't fix stuff that is not broken :-P
> I guess the CI is failing because of the dependency on the nuttx-apps PR? Nope, part in nuttx-apps fails too, something needs a fix, or there is a circular...
Thanks @wangchdo I did take a look at the changes, my questions below :-) >When signals are disabled, the related POSIX APIs—including sleep, usleep, kill, pkill, and pthread—will be disabled...
> > > When signals are disabled, the related POSIX APIs—including sleep, usleep, kill, pkill, and pthread—will be disabled as well. > > > > > > It's too limit...
I guess https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3217 by @extinguish is a prototype on @xiaoxiang781216 idea? :-)
> Appears to work properly on 8GB version, testing thanks to [@cederom](https://github.com/cederom). * The NuttX runs on rPI 4B 8GB but it only can see 2GB of RAM looks like...
> Wow [@cederom](https://github.com/cederom) ! Super helpful! What are you going to do with all those Pis now? NXDART :-) > I wonder why that's the case, I'll have to investigate...