Charlie Drage
Charlie Drage
Ewww. It's not fixed :( That's sad. Will have to just keep this as is for now.
Would possibly help with #202 and #113 to make maintainability a lot easier.
@goern do you agree that this is cleaner / better for easy-of-entry to Nulecule?
@goern @dustymabe @rtnpro @kadel Could I get some feedback :)
ping @goern @dustymabe @rtnpro @kadel
Hi @cliffbdf ! To be honest, the `Nulecule` spec documentation is lacking in terms of developer experience. Recently we've done a complete overhaul of our implementation `AtomicApp` here: [atomicapp](https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp) both...
Talked about this with @goern and concluded that atomicapp should _not_ know on the underlying storage and should let the underlying provider take care of that (take from a storage...
@goern Were you able to have a look at this? :) Going forward once we have this finalized I can implement this into atomicapp, especially since this would particular help...
ping @bexelbie @goern @dustymabe
@goern Better clarification / easier to understand. I remove the JSON "scheme" examples from the /nulecule spec as even I found them confusing hwne trying to understand it. Like I...