Guillaume

(1) has been rejected a few times in the past, like for `` (now ``) in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9648#issuecomment-1832692281. But I think [`` and ``](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-size-prop), [``](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-speech-1/#typedef-voice-family-age), [``](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-speech-1/#typedef-voice-family-gender), could be updated. I explored...

I would help reporting any update if you decide to produce this data, but I do not think it is worth it. That said, if specs do not output a...

Could you please clarify if this will also apply to [`CSSKeyframesRule.name`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-animations-1/#dom-csskeyframesrule-name)? I think browsers apply the same rule, but I have not checked recently.

I think you missed the [extension](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images-4/#radial-size) in CSS Images 4. But I would also prefer (y)our suggested syntax (#9730).

I closed #9730 in favor of this issue, to rephrase my questions about the `` extension in CSS Images 4. As noted in the comments above, it would be great...

I am asking in this issue because it seems to be the most active, but it is a duplicate of #2350: for specified value, why not just serialize as specified...

Take a look at #7164.

So `*-rule` shorthands should serialize with an empty string when some but not all longhands use `repeat(, )` at the same position, with the same ``, and with the same...