Christophe Dervieux

Thanks. I understand the usecase here. We'll see how we can improve the documentation for this. I need to think about this because the R Markdown Cookbook doesn't aim to...

I believe the issue comes from the `mdpi.cls` - do we know if this is compatible with xelalex or lualatex in the first place ? The **rticles** format is based...

Also there is one PR to update the template in https://github.com/rstudio/rticles/pull/381 which is missing contribution. Maybe this template needs a greater rewrite. If anyone wants to jump in ! Thanks

I think this is a `remark.js` behavior - See https://github.com/gnab/remark/issues/189 and Wiki documentation https://github.com/gnab/remark/wiki/Markdown#content-classes > In case of nested brackets, you can use HTML codes: > ``` > .footnote[.red.bold[*] Opening...

Yes I was thinking the same. It won't be simple. It will require some thinking. @k-hench can I asked the use case ? The real life example you have ?...

As you found, since recently, it is configurable. if you are using `main`, you need to `branch` option in `repo` field. > so I think the action item here might...

@jtr13 this has indeed been fixed in #1036. R4DS modified the config 4 days ago: https://github.com/hadley/r4ds/commit/f795a9a584bb1c8ef3f489c020171884e1ca7376 as they have started working on the second edition. The edit link are correct...

I believe this is related to another thread https://github.com/rstudio/bookdown/issues/1049 It is the second time that this situation is puzzling users since changes in https://github.com/rstudio/bookdown/issues/36#issuecomment-712166416 due to #405 and #852. Below...

Yes updating the documentation seems a good thing to do, thanks !

I believe this should be solved in **rmarkdown** directly. We already released (in **rmarkdown** 2.10) a quick fix for `html_document()` related output, but I don't think **reprex** is using `html_document()`...