Christophe Dervieux

@yihui I am not sure if we made changes recently that would have caused this... I tried different version with no success. You know better than me how `dev.new()` works...

I tried this document ````markdown --- output: html_document --- ```{r part1} f Could there be a solution similar to the par() function, where knitr has the possibility to set knitr::opts_knit$set(global.par...

> The issue is precisely with running the .Rmd interactively, a chunk at a time or with Run all. (Inside RStudio) This is definitely a RStudio IDE discussion then. **rmarkdown**...

> This is a new issue, not sure what changed. Do you remember when it was working ? Which version of the tools ? This is really puzzling to me...

I'll think about this. To understand full context, out of curiosity, why return `invisible(x)` in your print method ?

> Do I open an issue in that repository? Or does the issue stay open here? This is an issue to open there as it would required integration on their...

I think what I meant was "should _recommend_" to avoid confusion. And also because on Quarto side, only `server: shiny` is supported. https://quarto.org/docs/interactive/shiny/ > (Did you mean "server: shiny_prerendered... instead...

> I've just got the same html-output for both (server: shiny and runtime: shiny_prerendered) variants with quarto render|serve. Internally code is the same. On Quarto side, we do check only...

If you look at the HTML produced, you'll see this is something like this ````html Figure 1: A wrapped figure ```` So the `out.extra` you passed on the cell are...

Thanks. Why do you think using `{r}` is more consistent ? It has been asked already in - https://github.com/quarto-dev/quarto-cli/issues/10748 and I agreed with @cscheid on his answer > the previous...