cDc

running RefineMesh does not guaranty to deliver a perfect mesh; its performance will depend on many factors, among the most important being: accurate SfM reconstruction, good quality images, enough image...

did you process in both cases at the same resolution, etc? this might be a reason. what's the name of the online app?

I do not know what is that "smart 3d", don't u have a link? and pls share the input images

These are great news! I am searching since long time for a library implementing well such algorithms and I still didn't find one. Please let me know when you do,...

I finally found the issue, I have to manually call `connect()` after the mesh creation; that is fine, though what is not fine is that the code just runs normally...

``` GEO::Attribute charts; charts.bind_if_is_defined(gmesh.facets.attributes(), "chart"); ``` is failing, for some reason the attribute is deleted at the end of the function somehow; while there is a function to recompute them,...

the pack parameter might not be well used here: ``` Packer packer; packer.pack_surface(mesh, false); if(pack == PACK_XATLAS) { pack_atlas_using_xatlas(mesh); } ``` maybe should be: ``` Packer packer; packer.pack_surface(mesh, pack ==...

while the packing is needed, I can not find a way to recover it, so can you pls add a param to just skip the packing and I'll recompute it...

As far as I understand the chart is the list of face IDs contained in that chart. This is very useful for so many task, one of them for computing...

pls try latest develop, it should solve this problem