✨ Neutral Atom Mapper

[ystade]

Description

This is the start of a mapper tailored to the neutral atom platform. Peculiarities are global gates and shuttling of atoms, among others.

Checklist:

• [ ] The pull request only contains commits that are related to it.
• [ ] I have added appropriate tests and documentation.
• [ ] I have made sure that all CI jobs on GitHub pass.
• [ ] The pull request introduces no new warnings and follows the project's style guidelines.

[ystade]

@burgholzer Thanks for the helpful review, this was exactly the degree of detail I was looking for.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.10114% with 103 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.4%. Comparing base (b365106) to head (dc14583).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main    #417     +/-   ##
=======================================
+ Coverage   89.8%   90.4%   +0.6%     
=======================================
  Files         61      68      +7     
  Lines       6358    7851   +1493     
  Branches    1008    1277    +269     
=======================================
+ Hits        5711    7101   +1390     
- Misses       647     750    +103     

Flag	Coverage Δ
cpp	90.0% <93.1%> (+0.7%)	:arrow_up:
python	95.9% <ø> (ø)

Files	Coverage Δ
include/na/Architecture.hpp	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
include/na/Configuration.hpp	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
include/na/NAMapper.hpp	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
src/na/Configuration.cpp	94.4% <94.4%> (ø)
src/na/Architecture.cpp	98.8% <98.8%> (ø)
src/na/NAGraphAlgorithms.cpp	92.9% <92.9%> (ø)
src/na/NAMapper.cpp	89.8% <89.8%> (ø)

[burgholzer]

Hey @ystade 👋🏼 I took the liberty of going through the Architecture class and simplifying a couple of things in there. While some of these changes are only minor and could be considered cosmetic, at least on my machine, the tests show a significant speed-up from roughly 160ms -> 90ms. Would be interesting to see how this turns out in real experiments.