Christophe Bliard
Christophe Bliard
The failing spec `./modules/boards/spec/features/board_enterprise_spec.rb:63` is a flaky one which has been fixed in another PR. Merging.
> I'm not sure why you would want to expect a flash, but not it's type. This should be part of the test? Good question. I think I remember some...
It does not seem to attract much attention, so it is probably not needed. Closing.
This introduces regressions that are being worked on in https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/21332
@ulferts I added a failing test reproducing the issue in `spec/models/work_package/work_package_acts_as_journalized_spec.rb:60`.
Another category of tests is also failing, related to project copy: `./spec/workers/copy_project_job_spec.rb:83` Before the modifications done in #21325, there was two saves: - a first one in the service `#perform`...
Ok, so we had the opportunity to explore it more with @EinLama. Here is what we found about the current behavior on latest `dev` when copying a project: - a...
rebasing on `release/17.0`
While I agree on making boolean custom field non-required, the UI still shows that it can be required: If the scope is changed to exclude booleans, shouldn't the UI be...