Allow to remake it with vim-devel and add it to vim/colorschemes?
I plan to do it.
Before doing that, i think we should first match the neovim color groups, since they have changed with time, then let's see also what @sgoudham has to say about this.
Personally for me it is ok, and it would indeed be cool.
Sorry for the delay in responding to this issue, i see that you are already working on it and you are creating the theme from the ground up. Why not use this version instead, since it is more configurable?
I'm not creating the theme form the ground up. My PR at that repo is based on this repo indeed. And I had updated the color from the latest nvim repo in Mocha and Latte. The reason why it looks so different is that vim/colorschemes have many rules.
According to their review. I had made some changes. You can watch the PR to see the details.
@M3nny Do you have any idea about this problem? https://github.com/vim/colorschemes/pull/286#issuecomment-3315466071
@M3nny Do you have any idea about this problem? vim/colorschemes#286 (comment)
I decide to link QuickFixLine -> Search.
I submit some issues at nvim repo.
As https://github.com/vim/colorschemes/pull/286#issuecomment-3472394241
@M3nny What do you think about it? Could you provide something like permittion from the community?
Sorry to bother you @sgoudham, i know you are busy, the issue here is: "the maintainers from vim colorschemes need our approval to put the catppuccin name in their default colorschemes"
In order to avoid problems with naming, and since (correct me if i'm wrong @mao-yining ) the colorscheme that will be included in the default vim themes will have only one variant (that can change based on dark or light background, so mocha and latte). We could name the default vim colorscheme version as "catppuccin-vanilla" (or something similar).
And its development would be a little bit independent from this repository, since it will not support third party plugins.
@M3nny @mao-yining i have responded on the upstream issue: https://github.com/vim/colorschemes/pull/286#issuecomment-3473006058
in short, it means the upstream theme can exist in parallel but we won't be committing to changing this repo to match it exactly. i hope you find that to be an acceptable compromise!