feat(deepseek): init

[WalkQuackBack]

🎉 Theme for DeepSeek 🎉

💬 Additional Comments 💬

🗒 Checklist 🗒

• [ ] I have read and followed Catppuccin's submission guidelines.
• [ ] I have made a new directory underneath /styles/<name-of-website> containing the contents of the /template directory.
  • [ ] I have ensured that the new directory is in lower-kebab-case.
  • [ ] I have followed the template and kept the preprocessor as LESS.
• [ ] I have made sure to update the userstyles.yml file with information about the new userstyle.
• [ ] I have included the following files:
  • [ ] catppuccin.user.less - all the CSS for the userstyle, based on the template.

[WalkQuackBack]

This doesn't actually have an icon; the PR adding it was closed before merging, but the issue stayed closed.

[uncenter]

ref #1608 and #1703

[uncenter]

Login page, age verification modal (?), chat response feedback form/modal, and part of the final step in the share -> create public link modal are unthemed. The syntax highlighting is unthemed but is covered by using https://userstyles.catppuccin.com/contributing/guides/syntax-highlighting/#prismjs.

[WalkQuackBack]

Login page, age verification modal (?), chat response feedback form/modal, and part of the final step in the share -> create public link modal are unthemed. The syntax highlighting is unthemed but is covered by using https://userstyles.catppuccin.com/contributing/guides/syntax-highlighting/#prismjs.

PrismJS library was being used but reverted it in bf910fa to look further into how it was scoped.

[uncenter]

Can you elaborate on what "how it was scoped" means? In my testing that worked fine to theme the syntax highlighting.

[WalkQuackBack]

Can you elaborate on what "how it was scoped" means? In my testing that worked fine to theme the syntax highlighting.

Selector wasn't winning enough specificity. Fixed it by adding a parent class.

[WalkQuackBack]

Login page, age verification modal (?), chat response feedback form/modal, and part of the final step in the share -> create public link modal are unthemed. The syntax highlighting is unthemed but is covered by using https://userstyles.catppuccin.com/contributing/guides/syntax-highlighting/#prismjs.

Themed login page, chat response feedback modal, ds-rgb modal, syntax highlighting. Could you direct me to the place to activate the Age Verification? Or is it region specific?

[uncenter]

Themed login page, chat response feedback modal, ds-rgb modal, syntax highlighting. Could you direct me to the place to activate the Age Verification? Or is it region specific?

Probably a one time thing from not having signed in since the last pull requests. Assuming the other modal styling themes it the same anyhow.

Selector wasn't winning enough specificity. Fixed it by adding a parent class.

Oh yeah I guess I was using @import url("https://prismjs.catppuccin.com/variables.important.css");. That'll do the trick.

[uncenter]

I think using the important stylesheet is probably cleaner. Let's make that adjustment please.

[uncenter]

Can we switch the main chat background from mantle to base, switch the sidebar from base to mantle, and then bump the user chat messages and chat input bar from base to surface0 to match? Overall the UI looks very dark on mocha for me compared to other ports right now.

chat response feedback modal

The text input background on focus still looks unthemed fwiw.

and part of the final step in the share -> create public link modal are unthemed.

This is what I meant by that, still unthemed.

Language dropdown in settings could also be themed:

[uncenter]

Can we switch the main chat background from mantle to base, switch the sidebar from base to mantle, and then bump the user chat messages and chat input bar from base to surface0 to match? Overall the UI looks very dark on mocha for me compared to other ports right now.

This still doesn't seem to be resolved.