Mitch VanDuyn

Hang on... thinking: If you declare `param :foo, type: Hash` and you pass a native object, then we should serialize-deserialize the object. If you declare the type to be an...

hey look at that... it basically uses the implementation I thought was possible, but for whatever reason zetachang first adds "_on" to the front of the method name, then the...

@ajjahn - I think I understand how this would work: 1) naming convention would look for a class (module?) called ReactSerializer, and if such a class (module?) existed would use...

Yes the basics of what you outlined were exactly what I was figuring. My questions still stand however. _RE: "When we render :component in a controller or view, we can...

Its not just applicable to reactive-record (although reactive-record certainly needs some mechanism) The intention here is to provide some standard mechanism so that things "just work" in an obvious way,...

So this is blocking cleaning up PropsWrapper which is blocking context support, so it would be good to wrap this up. I think the best approach is to get this...

@ajjahn - RE: your comments over on #134 - I want to be sure we are on the same page here just we don't get confused. This has nothing to...

@fzingg yes I am imagining a standard set of semantics for components, models, stores, operations and policies. You can see how this works already as components can basically be described...

I certainly agree. It think it would be very very powerful if we had a crystal -> JS transpiler (like Opal) Meanwhile i guess it does make sense as interim...

FE = frontend (client side) BE = backend (server side) Full stack framework (i.e. hyperloop, meteor, volt) = FE + BE integrated So your proposal as I understand is to...