Mitch VanDuyn
Mitch VanDuyn
we should try to reproduce as we build 0.15 and close if other changes have fixed.
Hmmm... Okay well point 2 is definitely **NO** being able to say `state.foo!` without params is vital because it allows you to do this: `state.foo!
suggest we just close...
Yes.. frankly I think reactrb is way ahead on this... its simple easy and elegant. If we wanted to we could take one step further I think: We could build...
@wied03 okay I've assigned this to myself to wrap my head around it...
@zetachang - the above is what reactrb State does. The problem is as @wied03 points out is its too wrapped up in the base react code. I think the base...
as of 1.0.alpha1 all external names are moved (execpt HyperModel). Still some work for some internal names to go
yeah I'm okay with that... but it seems odd. Perhaps there is a different way to create an enumerable we should be using? The reason I say that, is what...
Also see #25 lets create a new gem for testing, and start shoving stuff in, and close this problem and #25
thanks for the heads up... Hopefully we can find another similar API