Catcher Wong
@luizcarlosfaria Thanks for your interest in this project. Sorry for this mistake. We will improve this in the next version, or can you submit a PR to help us improve...
@luizcarlosfaria Thanks for your interest in this project. The exchange type topic may be more suitable in the EasyCaching scenario. Although we can choose to allow users to customize, but...
@luizcarlosfaria Thanks for your interest in this project. This can be improved.
@Calx-Takeno Thanks for your interest in this project. Yes, we don't support `Sliding Expiration` at this time. It may be a feature of later versions, but it's not likely in...
@Simonl9l Thanks for your interest in this project. We will take a look ASAP.
@Simonl9l I'm very sorry, I don't have enough time to deal with this issue right now.
> Redis endpoints are discoverable via a service registry (consul). It would be great if the `AddEasyCaching` configuration action had access to the service provider. If your Redis endpoints are...
> Would there be a possible future alternate configuration approach where we can use a variation of the MyAddEasyCaching helper with with access to the `IServiceProvider` context I am not...
@luizcarlosfaria Thanks for your interest in this project. Yes, this is a fake implementation. The main considerations are as follows 1. It seems that the RabbitMQ client don't have async...
No response, Closed!