Nicola Castelletto

Hi @andrea-borio, I have a question that is not directly related to this PR. However, if the concern is legitimate, it may be resolved here. The convenience typedefs introduced in...

We should address this as part of #1094

> In a future PR some functionalities related to mapping between parent and physical spaces should be moved to a different part of the code as, right now, finite element...

Assuming the nonlinear residual is evaluated using the $L^{\infty}$-norm, normalizing each residual component by the corresponding cell mass ($\phi_n \rho_n V$) seems reasonable. Doing this for the $L^2$-norm doesn't make...

> **Proposed cleanup** > Remove all of these functions. We should just be using CRSMatrix objects and creating these objects from CRSMatrix. We can then focus on getting a shallow...

Is this ready to be merged? It seems quite a minor fix

I confirm it works. I ran an incompressible single-phase flow quarter five spot problem without gravity on two domains. The first case, the domain is aligned with the Cartesian axes...

Any updates on this PR?

My preference is to support only `VTK` output and ditch `Silo`. @cssherman could you remind me what Visit functionalities are missing in Paraview that justify supporting `Silo` in the long...

Based on #1402, I would say we can safely stop supporting `Silo` outputs.