paparazzi
paparazzi copied to clipboard
cashapp
Render your Android screens without a physical device or emulator
Paparazzi didn't give support to verify `gifs`. This PR implement that.
Each of the composables in our app have an associated Preview in the file for rendering in the IDE. It'd be great if there was a new annotation I could...
**Description** Error when running paparazzi record since updating to gradle 8 / Java 17 ``` kotlin.UninitializedPropertyAccessException: lateinit property sessionParamsBuilder has not been initialized at app.cash.paparazzi.Paparazzi$Companion.getSessionParamsBuilder$paparazzi(Paparazzi.kt:626) at app.cash.paparazzi.Paparazzi.prepare(Paparazzi.kt:162) at app.cash.paparazzi.Paparazzi$apply$statement$1.evaluate(Paparazzi.kt:124) at...
**Description** I've been trying to write a simple test for a view that uses data binding (root is layout), but I keep getting the error ``` Caused by: android.view.InflateException: Binary...
**Description** I've been trying to write tests for fragments that use viewbinding, but I see this error whenever I test a fragment which uses custom UI components inside of it....
**Description** When any part of Compose UI content uses the `animateContentSize` modifier, and `AccessibilityRenderExtension` is used, the content is offset 50% to the left of where it should be, leaving...
This migrates the plugin to newer AGP 8.0 APIs and using `AndroidComponents` APIs. This offers a few benefits: - Lazier evaluation across the board - Depending on artifact outputs rather...
**Description** When running Compose screenshot tests there is quite a bit of noise printed to stderr. ``` WalletPreviewTests > Test rendering of WalletsScreen in dark mode STANDARD_ERROR Jan 24, 2024...
I took a stab at #1221. While the release is not stable yet, maybe some of the changes are also required for the Iguana update and make that easier. Main...
Adds a FileNameProvider that can be implemented in any way to specify file names for a recorded Snapshot. Fixes #549 We wanted this feature because we had a developer on...
