Francesco Casella
Francesco Casella
@HansOlsson, @henrikt-ma, @perost, what do you think?
I agree with @perost, but I'd like to get some feedback from other tool vendors if there is agreement on how to interpret the specification in this case.
As I understand it, despite the claim the Modelica is an object-oriented language, it doesn't have polymorphism in function calls. The only place where polymorphism is allowed is redeclares. And...
> I don't see a reason to prevent usage of homotopy() in functions in general. Simplifying function or parts of their code is also a relevant use case - e.g....
@HansOlsson just for clarification: "no change" means that homotopy() is indeed allowed inside function algorithms, and whether or not the lambda = 0 case can be implemented efficiently is a...
> @casella using your "v.x" and "v.y" notation makes it difficult to identify what you are trying to describe Sorry, what I meant with v.x is some version (e.g. version...
OMG, sometimes I'm really dumb 😄. That's fixed now.
Good to see some consensus building up, it would be good to have other opinions, e.g. @mtiller, @MartinOtter, @beutlich, @AHaumer.
> Only 6 is real backward compatibility This is really too strict. If you really want this kind of backward compatibility, then you have to stick to the same version...
> True, but what is more interesting case is that if your library uses MSL 3.2.3 it is not guaranteed that it can be automatically converted to MSL 4.0.0. >...