Francesco Casella

Adding @mtiller, @mscuttari, @fedetft, @danielecattaneo, @adrpo to the loop.

We could also at some point implement an online service that gets a .mo file and the name of the class that must be flattened, and returns its BaseModelica output....

> #11853 encloses everything in a package with the same name as the model. I also moved function and record declarations to outside the model, previously everything was contained in...

I guess we should also keep a list of known issue with our implementation at the beginning of this ticket, and keep it up to date.

> It says so [here](https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/blob/MCP/0031/RationaleMCP/0031/differences.md), see section "Protected" towards the end of the page. True. I wrote a [comment](https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/pull/3162#issuecomment-1908727141) on the the PR that introduced that part, maybe we get...

>I didn't see any examples using the fully qualified path, but I guess there's also nothing saying you can't use it. It just seemed a bit weird having to write:...

@perost I am not sure we should remove flags so lightly or, even worse, keep them with a different meaning. People use them, and their code will be broken as...

> As far as I know no one is actually using `--flatModelica`, only the short form `-f` and you and your colleagues are the only ones using that one. So...

> Sure, but we're talking about a flag whose description makes it clear that it's experimental, and we've changed the output numerous times since adding it without anyone saying a...

@perost I prepared a small demo I'd like to show around. It contains all the basic ingredients: models, functions, and record. [BaseModelicaDemo.mo.txt](https://github.com/OpenModelica/OpenModelica/files/14132258/BaseModelicaDemo.mo.txt). The --BaseModelica output seems fine for me, except...