caryoscelus

Results 84 comments of caryoscelus

all cryptocurrencies are self made . everyone knows 99% of crypto is worthless . please don't repeat self-evident things and treat developers with respect . this is not crypto forum...

to all bystanders or random witnesses of this unpleasant discussion : please don't let this troll cast a bad impression on the 0net people (unfortunately can't call it community ,...

(see https://github.com/zeronet-conservancy/zeronet-conservancy/issues/37 for discussion of this in relation to conservancy fork)

this has been resolved in all major forks , zeronet-enhanced, ZeroNetX and zeronet-conservancy . those users who hesitate to upgrade to a full-on fork are still recommended to use https://github.com/zeronet-conservancy/zeronet-conservancy/releases/tag/v0.7.3...

ZeroNet is no longer developed . i suggest using https://github.com/zeronet-conservancy/zeronet-conservancy fork . if you follow install instructions there , this error shouldn't occur as `gevent` is included in `requirements.txt`

@WiteTigr1 wouldn't say it's too bad : ZeroNet under @nofish's direction had long-standing unresolved issues , multiple security vulnerabilities that didn't get fixed promptly upon discovery and ultimately stagnated long...

there are a few forks around . as its maintainer , i recommend https://github.com/zeronet-conservancy/zeronet-conservancy for the time being it's pretty much a consensus on the network that @nofish is gone...

@Ornataweaver sorry i shouldn't have used `@nofish` here since that's their handle on the 0net , not on github . here it's either @HelloZeroNet or @shortcutme

see https://www.reddit.com/r/zeronet/comments/s27d34/0net_forks/ or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZeroNet for less biased description of available forks

see the proposed solution [here](https://github.com/zeronet-conservancy/zeronet-conservancy/issues/36)