Phillip Carter

@dsyme now that we have APIs depending on this type (and pattern, really) it seems like the right thing to put on the docket for F# vNext

I will leave this to @dsyme if this should be a considered a "no" for now. The original filing of the issue was before `task` was implemented in FSharp.Core and...

I know that @tihan has spent some time thinking about how to make these happen for F#. One of the big sticking points in C# was arriving at the syntax...

I'd prefer `Slice` instead of `Segment` for the name

@kerams the Source Generators feature is currently in a very early preview. There's extensive design-time support planned, which you can read the beginnings of here: https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/blob/master/docs/features/source-generators.md#ide-integration. There's some interesting challenges...

As for the suggestion: I think this is something we'll want to wait a bit for. Firstly, C# Source Generators are just in their first preview and could undergo complete...

@OnurGumus I don't think we'll end up supporting syntactic macros: https://github.com/fsharp/fslang-suggestions/issues/210

@praeclarum Just a note about tooling, I think that view is quite Xamarin-focused and not representative of where most developers are. Xamarin is heavily C#-focused today, in large part due...

@Tarmil Yeah, file ordering does limit what you could do with F# in that way. I think that scenario in particular would be confusing to never enable, but without doing...

I would propose this is reworded as "anonymous active patterns", since it seems to be mostly about being able to define them as ad-hoc and anonymous. I think it's an...