Carl Smith

Sorry for my ignorance, but I'm struggling to understand exactly how this works with misaligned operations. Can the engine more efficiently load an `i32` from an (effective) address of `2`...

@aardappel - Thanks for the explanation. I'm still not sure I get it though. This would all be specific to WAT, not Wasm. The binary format would not need to...

Fair enough. Keeping close to the binary format is a good reason.

If writing WAT by hand is a concern now, it seems like the syntax should allow (even if only potentially in the future) `data` elements to use typed integers (as...

> Why do you think WAT will never be satisfactory for writing code? It's verbose, requires a lot of redundant information, and S-expressions. People have already published WAT supersets. I've...

The only point I really wanted to make is already covered by #1348. When I wrote my original comment, I still thought handwritten WAT was beyond scope.

@sammax - Sorry, I haven't seen the annotations proposal either. I've always found it unusually difficult to find information about Wasm and WAT development. Could you link to the proposal,...

Thank you, @sammax. Much appreciated.

Thanks, awesome. Sorry I didn't see this sooner.

An example of how to set (and update) a `sampler2D` using a JS array buffer would be really cool.