Carlos Alberto Cortez

@thegreystone He. I think we'd like to iterate over the existing items the incoming week (for adjusting/updating the API depending on the feedback), and then perhaps issue a second RC...

Even though `Continuation` is not part of the main API, this check still exists for 0.31 using `Scope`: https://github.com/opentracing/opentracing-java/blob/master/opentracing-util/src/main/java/io/opentracing/util/ThreadLocalScope.java#L42 Wondering if this is still a problem with the way activation...

Trying to prevent this Issue to become stale, a pair of things: 1) Once we implement some kind of Observer API, this kind of things could at least be reported...

Going to mark this issue as "Enhancement" as it looks we need Java 1.7.x and above. Is this the case? @yurishkuro

Guess that's something similar to the `harness` submodule/test we have in Python, so implementations of Tracer/ScopeManager can be verified against the expected behavior. That would definitely be handy - and...

Sounds like it was agreed that the SLF4J concept could be added as an extension, rather than in the core. Shall we close this issue? @fzakaria @yurishkuro

Hey @t-8ch I think having `Span`s that can be created and started later is something that, even if evidence shows they are needed, would take some time to adopt and...

My two cents as a potential contributor: if the buffer can't be known in advance for `Inject`, I'd suggest using `MemoryStream`, which is basically a resizable `byte[]`, and it even...

@ndrwrbgs Also, we had to remove (for now) the new implementation of `Binary`, as some people were worried the current approach was not the best one (currently being tracked in...

@ndrwrbgs not quite - some of us are worried exposing an actual, full `Stream` object will be too much (hence the iterations involving simple methods for writing/reading). And we need...