Carl Meyer

As a workaround, if you change your annotation to `Optional[str]` (probably a good idea anyway, since implicit-optional based on None default is sorta deprecated, the preferred mypy behavior is the...

I think @mpage might already have some WIP on this?

Good idea!

@mpage Not all projects are that big :-) I've worked on plenty of projects in the past with module counts in the tens, rather than hundreds or thousands, where it...

@msoedov Thanks for the suggestion! Can you clarify what semantics you'd envision for `monkeytype apply .`? Would it try to apply all stubs present in the trace store? Or all...

@johnarnold I'm not aware of anyone working on it, take it away!

I'm not aware that anyone is working on this currently. If you'd like to work on it, pull requests are welcome! IMO either "allow passing multiple modules to apply" or...

I’m not sure it will make sense for MonkeyType to inherently support multiprocessing; not sure if the multiprocessing module even has the hooks necessary for transparent support to be possible....

I think the overhead is coming from the `sys.setprofile()` hook that MonkeyType uses (the same one used by e.g. cProfile and `coverage.py`). I'm curious if the same disparity occurs e.g....

Thanks for the report! The `ForwardRef` references in MonkeyType's code are for cases where we get the existing annotation from the code and need to reproduce it in our stub....