Caridy Patiño
Caridy Patiño
@matthewp I used multi-lines just to facilitate the discussion, but you can always go 1-liner. Btw, just a side note: I haven't seeing a lot of that (`if (needsThing)` at...
we should solve https://github.com/whatwg/loader/issues/72 first, then we can get back to this use case.
@domenic @dherman @wycats I did some preliminary work on https://rawgit.com/caridy/ecmascript-loader/master/index.html (as discussed last week) to move `Reflect.Loader` and `Reflect.Module` back into 262 since they are [authority free](https://github.com/whatwg/loader/issues/34#issuecomment-126768933). Here are my...
We have been looking for a fallback mechanism, maybe extending the accept header, or any other request header is the solution. By doing that, we should be able to do...
@matthewp imagine a service that analyzes the header, and infers whether or not the browser supports modules, and based on that it responses with a module or a transpiled version...
Ah, @matthewp, I finally see what you mean, let me rephrase it in my first comment...
@joeldenning that is correct. Without the ability to set `System.loader` to a new loader instance, we have only two choices: - AOP on `System.loader`'s hooks to control `System.loader.import()` calls. -...
@joeldenning this is a question of whether `` will have rely on a mutable `System.loader` or not, and what are the implications of that from the security point of view...
_note: I don't think there is precedent for the property get triggered by HTML semantics, but I might be wrong._
ha, that is a good example. thanks @joeldenning.