Chris Suszynski

@Tibor17 Yes. Actually, I started development in that way. For example: `-DrunOrder=random:123456`. But, that lead to some dirty code because `RunOrder` is a enum like class, and it's hard to...

Is there something to fix with this PR or everything is okey now?

Yes. I'll rebase the code.

I've: 1. merged the code with upstream, 1. change the mechanism to utilize existing runOrder parameter like: `-DrunOrder=random:123456` 1. added some tests to cover the changes 1. fixed some integration...

What's the process? Are we waiting for someone?

Hello, @Tibor17 Yey or Nay?

Yup. I run them all multiple times. In fact I correct flaky ones. All should pass.

Yup. It's the right branch. Those tests are ones that I added. They test if running with given seed will produce repeatable build. Ideally it should produce the same outcome...

Ok. I've manage to fix this bug. Tests are now passing on Linux and Windows on multiple JDK: Azul, Oracle and OpenJDK. The error was that test randomization was done...

@Tibor17 Please review