Jiri Spac

I just have this very basic project set up and I try most of the things there: https://github.com/capaj/type-gql-with-binding-boilerplate Our production project is way to complex for experimenting like that. You...

@pie6k that's doable, but I'd have to compile my class into a GQL schema. Which is another extra line :confused:

@pie6k thanks! Your solution sounds much better than having an extra type. By recursive fields you mean what exactly? Even if `Footype` has a complex type in a field, it...

Sounds good :+1: I'll keep this open because if you decide not to unify, it would be good to at least do this one. Regarding the mutation variables-I am not...

@pie6k I tried that exact thing on a dynamically added property and it did not work. It might work if I call it on a property which is defined at...

sure. For our production API at @leaplabs we use objection.js as our abstraction over a database. We have many models-around 40 with many relations between them. Usually a model has...

@pie6k that works indeed, but my issue is when I have a Field added at runtime also. So it would need to be like: ```js it('Will allow registering a Field...

awesome @19majkel94! Will take a stab at implementation.

I did make it work in my namespaced fork of typegql: https://github.com/capaj/typegql/commit/19a9dd5444723f1993e4840964eedeeae43904f4 I attempted the same in this [repo](https://github.com/prismake/typegql/compare/master...capaj:infer-Date?expand=1) and it ended up in error while building: ``` $ ttsc...

for the JSON fix shoud be easy, but currently it suggests these two actions everywhere. Ideally it would only suggested them if a JSX code block is selected.