canonical
ui: update_report: fix source/binary confusion (LP: #2102147)
Rather than relying on binary packages being named the same as their source package, we actually split the two of them. There's an underlying assumption that we're reporting to a backend that cares about source packages, so that's what we're basing it all on, by adding a field to list the binary packages actually installed from that source package.
It might not work perfectly (the Package field will be marked with "not installed" for glibc, for instance), but it's still much better than the current state.
Bug-Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/2102147
Ugh, apparently the tests assume that -p is for the source package. This entire thing is just sooooo confusing.