Cameron More

I agree. Suppose there's a manufacturing process A, during which some widgets are forged and then cooled. Both the forging process and the cooling processes are parts of the manufacturing...

Talking with @jonathanvajda about this, in light of recent discussions about process profile, if we agree with Barry's interpretation of processes that processes _are_ changes, then it makes no sense...

I'll leave it open until we come down on a way to handle stasis going forward, unless someone else wants to close it. I think your description of what I...

@alanruttenberg Since we have the term 'Material Artifact', and it's a subclass of Material Entity and not object, has this issue been addressed?

Members of the community have recently done work which adds to the semantics at work here [arxiv paper here](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00183) (@johnbeve may correct anything I misrepresent) In sum: while an artifact...

There are no current plans to update this document, but I'm happy to write a new version with collaborators, and will keep it in mind on further documentation.

There are two strategies that come to mind in handling this case. Generally product designs are modeled with cco:ArtifactModel, in which the Artifact Model cco:prescribes some Artifact (or modally prescribes...

@neilotte would we need a whole ontology or just a brief document that describes them? Depending on how many shortcuts you have, is it worth it? Open to the idea,...

@neilotte Agree, we discussed this in the IEEE meeting you missed, and I personally favor the policy "shortcuts are fine as long as the robust semantics do exist outside PowerPoints...

I'm thinking along the lines of something like the following paradigmatic case in the information model: Rather than... `cco:Person cco:designated_by cco:CodeIdentifier . cco:CodeIdentifier obo:generically_depends_on cco:InformationBearingEntity . cco:InformationBearingEntity cco:has_value "A123" .`...