Ricardo Arturo Cabral Mejía

@doc-hex should we add a setting for specifying whether the relay is `private` or whether it requires `pow` or `payment`?

> I think this should just be shoved into NIP-11. Why not? yeah why not? it won't break any client and 1 less NIP

> > My naive approach would be to have additional properties added onto the event JSON which can be ignored when doing verification. If the server already has the data...

> @Cameri Of course you can implement it without a NIP first. Clients might get confused by extra fields in events though. To then use that field, we definitely should...

> these tallies, are they global? like, is the relay counting from all events it has? or is this derived from the request? > > > > > { >...

> > Not sure what you mean by global. > > > > those numbers are coming from all reactions the relay has seen or from a list of authors...

> new aggregation requirement: zaps with amounts counted from the bolt11. not sure if there's a general way to implement this, I will need custom magic regardless it seems like....

> @Cameri how feasible are these tallies for you to implement? Would you keep a separate cache for them somewhere? > > > > @scsibug @atdixon how do you see...

> > @Cameri how feasible are these tallies for you to implement? Would you keep a separate cache for them somewhere? > > > > > > > > @scsibug...

Looks like this is a duplicate of https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/85