cachet Ensure Cachet Commands Respect `--no-interaction`

In particular, the cachet:install command needs to select good defaults automatically (if it can). Perhaps we should allow the command to create an sqlite database on disk?

Dec 28 '18 22:12 GrahamCampbell

We did start this, but I think providing sensible defaults is the best option, including generating a password for an admin account.

Dec 29 '18 10:12 jbrooksuk

but I think providing sensible defaults is the best option

Yeh, then with sensible defaults, --no-interaction will work properly.

Dec 29 '18 13:12 GrahamCampbell

This bug extends to the framework core commands too.

Dec 31 '18 00:12 GrahamCampbell

@GrahamCampbell where are we about this feature ? Do you know if we can user cachet:install without any interaction in a salt recipe for example (with an admin account created) ?

Apr 08 '20 18:04 brunob

The idea would actually be that the command crashes and says you have to run it with interaction. Rather than just hanging forever waiting for input.

Apr 08 '20 19:04 GrahamCampbell

@GrahamCampbell thx for answer, so you mean that for now we can't fully install and configure cachet from a script or a salt recipe ?

Apr 09 '20 09:04 brunob

Hey, is there an update regarding this? I looked for a way to automate the initial setup of cachet but couldn't find a way. Thanks.

Nov 30 '21 13:11 mor120