Jacob Cable

@maciejgoscinski-latrace >This is a very likely scenario - I think we did change (and surely intended to change further) the parameters during the backfill, at least the one to add...

@maciejgoscinski-latrace Thanks, do you have average execution time as well? It is strange that we have so many successful invocations over such a period, that's ~80M invocations! something weird is...

> at least the one to add our thumbnail folders wildcard patterns to the exclude list. ah just for context, did those thumbnail folders have lots of images in to...

Could you see if you can provide logs that show when/how many times the extensions were reconfigured? You may have to modify it, but a query like this in Log...

Hi! Thanks for the extra metrics. > Could you see if you can provide logs that show when/how many times the extensions were reconfigured? Are you able to provide the...

I think the key part of the query would be `protoPayload.methodName="google.cloud.functions.v1.CloudFunctionsService.UpdateFunction"` the function name `resource.labels.function_name="ext-storage-resize-images-backfillResizedImages" ` would depend on your extension instance ID, this one is just the default

> We would be very grateful if you could clearly confirm that from what we've learned so far, this is an abnormal behaviour of the extension, and it's not reasonable...

Hi @maciejgoscinski-latrace - I will discuss this with the team today. We could remove the backfill feature without removing the extension entirely. It's bizarre as we still haven't been able...

As for reproduction - I will put together some queries you can try and run to extract more info on the deployments.

Hi, thanks for opening this issue! I'm not sure it will fix #932 though, as the function will still be invoked? The filtering happens *after* the invocation within the runtime...