datahub
datahub copied to clipboard
TRACERx Renal dataset
Three papers on the TRACERx Renal dataset:
- https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(18)30389-1
- https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(18)30375-1
- https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(18)30164-8
Maybe we only need to curate one dataset for these three studies: ccrcc_tracerx_2018
?
- [ ] create a issue on datahub before curating a study (one issue per study) and copy this checklist to the issue tracker
- [ ] List information of the dataset/paper in the issue, e.g. pmid, paper link, suppl file link
- [ ] Document the curation process, e.g. how and by whom the data was transformed
- [ ] Follow the data checklist
- [ ] Create a pull request to datahub once the data is curated
- [ ] Push to triage portal
- [ ] Import into msk and public portal database
- [ ] Update cBioPortal news
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
3 papers share the same ~100 patient pool. All data needs merging.
Question: do we merge the 3 panels into one?
For paper 1 - https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(18)30389-1 Driver panels: Table S6 tab "Driver panels" ("∼110 putative ccRCC driver genes") Mutation data: Table S6 tab "SNV_INDEL_DNV" Arm-level somatic CNA: Table S6 "Arm-level SCNA" Clinical: Table S1A, Table S1D, Table S1E
For paper 2 - https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(18)30375-1 Clinical - Table S1A, S1B Driver panels: Table S2 tab "Driver panels" Mutation data: Table S2 tab "SNV_INDEL_DNV" (this mutation data seems to include all the samples of paper 1 already and using the same sample - didn't confirm if the mutations are totally overlapped as well, need double checking) Arm-level somatic CNA: Table S2 "Arm-level SCNA" *there's further WES/WGS for a subset of samples, but the data is not available - don't think we need to ask for that data, seems like it's more for validation purpose?
For paper 3 - https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(18)30164-8 Clinical - Table S1,S2 *they discovered "Novel hotspot of driver mutations in 5′-UTR repressor of TERT" (data not available tho), but since portal don't include those mutations, guess we don't need to ask for that data for now?
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.