Claire Foster
Claire Foster
On further consideration, I do agree that this is confusing, and ideally could be deprecated in future as a warning, then an error. The amount of breaking would need to...
Heya, we just moved JuliaSyntax into Base in https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/59870 - if you want to re-propose this PR over there, I've created a branch https://github.com/JuliaLang/JuliaSyntax.jl/tree/pr-for-Base/513 to make this easier. To make...
I think it could be nice to do *something* here ... but I'm not sure what it should be. For example, even comments can act as semantic whitespace: ``` julia>...
The general approach of `JuliaSyntaxFormatter` is to emit a stream of tokens including the semantic whitespace as "flexible space". Then later run a heuristic formatting pass which decides what each...
The least invasive fix could be the type assert of opts I mentioned in #615, if that works?
Thanks for the detailed description of the invalidations btw, I do love to see it :)
Heya, we just moved JuliaSyntax into Base in https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/59870 - if you want to re-propose this PR over there, I've created a branch https://github.com/JuliaLang/JuliaSyntax.jl/tree/pr-for-Base/475 to make this easier. To make...
This error arises from lowering, it's not really a JuliaSyntax issue: ```julia julia> (101im).:($(:im)) 101 julia> (101im).:($(Symbol("im"))) ERROR: syntax: invalid syntax "(101 * im).(Symbol("im"))" around REPL[25]:1 Stacktrace: [1] top-level scope...
Heya, we just moved JuliaSyntax into Base in https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/59870 - if you want to re-propose this PR over there, I've created a branch https://github.com/JuliaLang/JuliaSyntax.jl/tree/pr-for-Base/601 to make this easier. To make...
Thanks James sorry for the bother. Ideally I'd like to never release code out of this repo again, but if it's most expedient to do so for the purposes of...