c3js
axis.x.tick.fit documentation is incorrect (backwards)
From the docs:
If true set, the ticks will be positioned nicely. If false set, the ticks will be positioned according to x value of the data points.
In this example however, setting 'fit' to 'true' causes the ticks to be positioned according to the x value of the data points while setting to false actually makes the ticks appear nicely spaced.
"If true set, the ticks will be positioned nicely."
This is true. In given example when fit is set true, it positioned nicely - ticks appear only where data is. If it's false, ticks have even spacing, but are not necessarily where the exact points are - 'not nicely'.
I think your picture of 'positioned nicely' is simply different than one of the author of documentation.
Hmmm, I can see how the first sentence may be read subjectively. However,
If false, the ticks will be positioned according to the x value of the data points.
This part appears to be objectively incorrect. If set to false the ticks are positioned evenly, without regard to what the x value of the data points are.
In either case the wording should probably be changed to be more explicit.
I, too, was confused by the documentation regarding this feature. "Positioned nicely" is vague language, and the documentation for the false case is indeed just wrong as @Zerim pointed out.
How about changing it to: "If true, ticks will be positioned according to the x value of the data points. If false, ticks will be evenly spaced along the x-axis." It's wordier, but more clear about what to expect from the setting.
