Cameron Thornton

Can you help me with one more level of confirmation that the field cannot be updated? It'd be breaking if we were not correct, and I just want to make...

Internal bug discussion pointed out that this is unlikely to be done as another feature is considered in b/132685471. Closing as this issue is quite old.

> Been meaning to get input on this. With this being marked as a breaking change would we include this into the 6.0.0 release @c2thorn ? There's not a lot...

This has missed the cutoff for 6.0, so I will close it to prevent it from accidentally getting merged into a minor release.

Hi @ghabian Tomorrow, the Magic Modules repository is scheduled to undergo a language migration from Ruby to Go. You can view more details about this in our announcement here: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-google/issues/19583...

It has been several weeks and this PR is likely too far out of date to convert with our tooling. Please disregard my previous comment and recreate this PR in...

Hey folks, this seems to be a common issue that doesn't stem from the Terraform implementation itself. From what I can tell, there may be dependent resources not visible to...

Hi @GauravJain21 Tomorrow, the Magic Modules repository is scheduled to undergo a language migration from Ruby to Go. You can view more details about this in our announcement here: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-google/issues/19583...

I've updated the base branch to point to the major release branch. This should be good to continue. I've forgotten what the exact breaking change is here - but please...

@daanheikens Thanks for the information. As I now understand, this is a breaking change due to the parent field having [schema_config_mode_attr](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules/blob/main/mmv1/products/compute/Subnetwork.yaml#L210). I planned on testing the effect of [removing schema_config_mode_attr](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-google/issues/12824)...