Ivan Kanakarakis

> > How far we want to go with that is what we discuss here. I'm all in for pushing that a lot. If you feel we should restrict this...

> I prefer to close this PR. This started as a simple and harmless imho refactoring to improve readability and complexity on the track of solving a minor issue and...

> I'm more than interested in trying to discover possible answers to these questions. cool; so I'm reopening this 🙂 --- > My point was that this PR started as...

Related to #146

This is what I have a in mind: The validator needs to be built before it can be used. It needs to be provided with the namespaces and schemas that...

That'd be nice, I think. +1

Hello, I'm trying out MAJA and seeing this, too. The following is the beginning of the process I run with the same error: > The detector indices are not in...

Hi Olivier and thanks for the swift reply, you are right, I should have been more specific. Our remarks refer to cloud detection accuracy. > merging different swaths improves the...

We run MAJA v4.2.1 (official binary release) on Ubuntu 18.04 (a Vagrant VM), in a dedicated miniconda environment setup with `python=3.6.8` `gdal=2.3.3` and `scipy=1.3.0`. The command we use after having...

Hello @jerome-colin (also, following up from https://github.com/CNES/MAJA/issues/82#issuecomment-766671932) from what I see in our installation of MAJA-4.2.1 (manually built), we already have the `L2CoarseResolution` set to `240`. ``` $ pwd [reducted]/tools/maja/v4.2.1/install/maja/4.2.1...