Brenton M. Wiernik

the current normality check isn't really appropriate generally except for linear models. something like the DhARMA QQ plots would be more appropriate

Can you share some screenshots of what they are seeing and also share their hardware information (especially graphics card and display driver)?

That would be good. I wonder if we should also try to detect if number of discrete fitted values is small/all the predictors are categorical and then omit the linearity...

We should probably just have alternative visualizations for categorical models. The current plots really only work for models with continuous predictors so that there are numerous fitted values on the...

I would suggest we do `check_residuals(model)` as the workflow so that we can have correct titles for the plot instead of "Normality of residuals"

> ok, so `check_residuals()` would be an additional check we add to the existing functions, right? What about `check_model()`? Which residual plots do we want there? Or should we add...

I'm not too familiar with what check_zeroinflation() does under the hood to comment on the broader issues raised here ATM. For count models, Poisson, negative binomial, geometric, and binomial (not...

I'm not sure what you mean @strengejacke about the distinction between Bayesian and frequentist frameworks?

Okay yeah I agree. I think May not really be a Bayes/freq thing but rather than Paul would probably just object to the Nakagawa use of marginal there.

Might also be related to https://discourse.mc-stan.org/t/brms-how-to-get-the-icc-or-vpc-value-for-a-multi-level-negative-binomial-model/24046/3?u=bwiernik