Benjamin W. Bohl
Benjamin W. Bohl
So the question concerning your proposed changes would be: what are ”adjacent layers”?
@martha-thomae and @annplaksin could you please add your reviews ;-)
> In my opinion, `` isn't needed. Its intended function can be encoded using ``. `` has the added benefit of being able to associate multiple roles with a name...
Like the harmonisation, nevertheless dislike that you had to reference all those other classes just to change one of them… Seems to me that maybe we should rethink the attribute...
would this just introduce `@tgrp` or also remove `@ho`?
I agree with @ahankinson that some info on potential use cases would help evaluate this idea. Adding `att.coordinated` to `` would require rephrasing the element's description because it is defined...
concerning 1. I think we should try to rephrase the description of `@head.shape` removing the implicit assumptions. made by "override" "normally" and "duration" words. Why not just say something like:...
2021-10-28 ODD meeting: * maybe some kind of notation style definition in the header could help * documentation and best practice examples will be essential to documenting this
I second this deviation from the TEI model. And also think that keeping the facsimile tree a flat (two-dimensional) space is adequate and more clear for describing a two-dimensional space....