Lukas Burgholzer

Hey 👋🏼 Many thanks for opening this PR! I am pretty busy at the moment, so it might take me some time to get to it. Two things up front:...

You are welcome. I'll keep this issue open for now to track the feature request. I'll close once the PR implementing the feature is merged.

> Hi @burgholzer , > > I wanted to ask if there was any news about adding the feature? Hey 👋🏼 This is definitely still on our radar. At the...

Hey @pehamTom 👋🏼 Haven't looked through this at all yet. Just a brief question: Is this something that's always guaranteed to be faster than the original version? If so, could...

> Ignoring the phase during synthesis does not guarantee depth-optimality. One could always back-propagate Paulis and fuse them with any single-qubit gates as a post-processing step. But I think it...

With the merge of #424, the situation has become quite a bit better here. I'd still like to remove the logicblocks completely and keep some of the useful wrappers at...

Just for reference: https://github.com/cda-tum/qfr/issues/205 tracks the corresponding feature in the QFR where the optimization passes reside.

Closing in favor of #432

Closing in favor of #432

Ok. Getting shared libraries to work properly is more work than anticipated. I am going to split this PR apart and will focus on getting the changes that are not...