Michael Bumann
Michael Bumann
Actually authentication would not be important for us at this point.
@tnolet yeah, that's awesome. thanks for the info. I am happy to beta test :)
is this somewhere specified? or does the bank have a spec that we can link to?
I mean we have mt940 file descriptions from various banks. maybe we can mention the bank somewhere with that format? I am fine merging this, seems to not change any...
@kangguru what do we do with this? should this go in the next release?
thanks for the PR. looks good to me. does anybody else have a review?
@Uepsilon or @kangguru you want to have a look. it looks good to me.
Thanks for raising this. And yes, that is confusing... A hash indicates that it is an unique identifier and can be reliably used to identify a transaction and that no...
thanks @grncdr for your input. very valuable. So I think we for sure should add the details to generate the hash. this should be a simple change to the [61...
would using that [sha of the whole statement](https://github.com/railslove/cmxl/blob/2bef6142576bd4af30b38c8226bab9023a9b4879/lib/cmxl/statement.rb#L53) + field sha + line index help? or as we try to somehow generate a unique identifier for the field we could...