Christian Buhtz

Thanks for the reply. It is a nice to have feature. But I vote to keep it as it is. The BIT code is not in shape to add something...

OK, the task would be to dive back into the code around the year 2016 and see what Germar removed. I am open to reviewing pull requests, but currently BIT...

> Apparently this is a KDE problem under X11, so not specific to Backintime: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-workspace/-/merge_requests/139 Seems that this PR was rejected. But it seems also clear that this problem is...

The high-scaling topic is very hot in the GNU/Linux community and a lot of development goes on about it. I'm not able to test but I assume this could be...

Just documenting my own thoughts: Why does that hard coded limit `self.max_cmd_len = 100` exist? I see no reason against using `ssMaxArgs.py` to figuring out the real limit.

There is fog in my head but maybe I have touched this topic somehow in the past? Isn't it fixed somehow? 👴 Dear @mauromol , can you reproduce this with...

About the README: I assume you saw the "old" version in the `main` branch. The newer and latest version is in the `dev` branch. We discussed this in the team...

> About the README: I'm talking about the version of the README that is shown when you go to the code tab of this GitHub repository, hence at: https://github.com/bit-team/backintime Correct,...

The missing `--profile-id 1` is also no problem because it is used as default. Closing because the problem seems to be solved or not reproducible with the latest BIT version....

Dear mauromol, thanks for reporting back. Can you give us the paramters how do you setup the snapshot profile to reproduce this problem. According to the code this limit seems...