buck

For reference I have a PR that adds a satisfier for validating this caveat on LSATs for the service I'm aiming to use this for. See `IsExpiredSatisfier` [here](https://github.com/stakwork/sphinx-meme/blob/36433dd4c76bf3d75d0d526d9223a24b00503579/lsat/satisfier.go#L87)

@ellemouton im not sure I totally understand. Is aperture used in lncli or between access from lncli and lnd? My understanding is that this is a proxy server used in...

Ah, yeah sure I can change the name. Everything else still basically needs to be done after the caveat goes through as far as I understand the way aperture is...

The problem with `valid_until` is the way that aperture configs work (again, as far as I'm aware). Since they're static, you'd have to constantly keep updating it to useful. If...

Got it. Thanks for the update! We do want to revisit this soon but sounds like it’ll make sense to do it on the new API. Largely if we can...

@ellemouton I just wanted to bump this one more time to see if it's something that could be supported in the official aperture repo so we don't have to rely...

Hi @ellemouton, now it's my turn to apologize for the delayed response! > But if we are making a whole new Timeout field - it is not clear that the...

Fantastic! My plate has been clearing up after a very busy few months so I’ll try and get an update up soon. as an aside, a plug-in system would be...

@ellemouton take a look! the timeout caveat (which is set as service suffix + `_valid_until`) is now validated by aperture as well and there are tests for the satisfier and...

@ellemouton no problem. Hope this is better!