Izzy Muerte

Hi, apologies. life got in the way. Thanks for the ping :) Regarding your previous message it looks like they fixed the memcpy compile time that used to work. That's...

Hey apologies, it's been a minute since I responded. > You formulate it as an implementation detail, not as something defined by the standard. If this is not defined in...

I'd like to briefly make an argument against the `@keyword` (as much as I am a fan of the `@tribute` pun), and point out that C23 will have standardized the...

It is more than doable. It'll require an `$` and I can link to some docs. I'll do it in an hour or two as I’m currently on mobile. 😅

I was wrong, apologies. It requires an `$` ```cmake $ ``` Should fix it, however I'm aware this isn't as readable. Defining it via `string(CONCAT)` should help in that regard:...

Generator expressions execute in parallel at generation time, instead of during configure time, which is single threaded. In a small project isolated it is not a performance issue. In million-line...

That's the thing. It doesn't get re-evaluated. Its evaluated *once* at generation time, and then simply read from. It's just that the processing and evaluation is pushed into a multithreaded...

I did understand. I'm saying that it's a negligible genex re-evaluation, even in large projects, even across multiple process. And if you don't want these to be re-evaluated, use `$`.

I do not see why the cost of configuring the project should be put on the project itself, when the actual speed at generation time is *again* so small that...

lol, yeah that works. WOOPS