Byron Ruth

@sgithens A one-to-one field as far as Django is concerned is: > similar to a ForeignKey with `unique=True`, but the “reverse” side of the relation will directly return a single...

I invited you to GitBook: https://www.gitbook.com/book/dbhi/harvest/details which is backed by the new repo I created here: https://github.com/chop-dbhi/harvest-book. There is an web client and a OS X client to add and...

If all that was required was to combine multiple models into one logical model, then a method would need to be added to the API to take a list of...

> But I worry about violating WYSIWYG. I generally agree with this. A more practical application would be to create a tool that copies an existing data model, increments the...

In what context is it difficult to distinguish? Other than knowing which tables _are_ the vocabulary tables (which not everyone does), where would this be useful?

> This is a hack but involves finding all columns named *_concept_id that are not in vocabulary tables and creating new *_concept_name columns. In practice, reliable conventions appear to be...

> magic list of vocab tables .... That puts things into perspective. I guess this information is no where. Tags or labels could be an interesting piece of the spec....

This is likely due to the BOM if you exported this from Excel.. https://stackoverflow.com/a/17912811/407954

Created #6

@Jarema you can decide who works on this, but this will be in scope for 2.11. The plan is to only propagate this new field to jsm.go in order to...