Bruno Lajoie

Results 29 comments of Bruno Lajoie

Great news @thomasgibon. I've contacted ecoinvent last week through their contact-us generic email, (no answer yet) and would be happy to try again if you could give me in private...

Thanks! I'm in discussion with Econinvent. Will let you know

@thomasgibon, I'd be happy to have a chat with you about your proposed [approach](https://github.com/tmrowco/electricitymap/issues/738#issuecomment-355961388), ping me on slack anytime!

We have a new lead: The following paper "[Real-Time Carbon Accounting Method for the European Electricity Markets](https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06679)", supplementary material Table 1,2,3, provides: **emission factors for each EU country, per type...

Thanks Thomas. I'm not comfortable mixing using IPCC average for non-EU country, and ecoinvent-derived data for EU countries. The methodology and underlying assumption would be very different. Ideally, what we...

Table A.III.2 is already what we use. However you see it's not "global coal average" but only "Pulverized coal PC", which makes this 820 a bit low for the electricityMap....

Yes, the idea of the toogle switch would be awesome. As discussed [above](https://github.com/tmrowco/electricitymap-contrib/issues/738#issuecomment-448309577) we're waiting for the peer review of the following [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06679) which could provide such figures. We would...

@thomasgibon I personally like very much the split in the paper (operational vs. non-operational emissions. One is clearly per kWh. The other depends on the lifetime & load factor of...

The paper is now peer-reviewed and published [here](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X19300549) We shall be able to use it to finally update our default emission factor per country, using table 1 from [supplementary material](https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S2211467X19300549-mmc1.pdf)...

These figure were derived from ecoinvent Database. @thomasgibon might know the exact answer!