zed icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
zed copied to clipboard

A novel data lake based on super-structured data

Results 435 zed issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

Based on black box testing, `zq` (commit a7522c2 at the moment) currently only seems to treat the `#empty_field (empty)` as indicative of empty `set` & `vector` types. But it looks...

bug

With the current `join` implementation, there's currently no way to reference the second order predicate paths when inside a User Op. ## Details Repro is with super commit f86de86. Let's...

As of super commit b8311a3, type checking in SuperDB is all dynamic. This prevents us from being able to deliver some functionality, such as error messages at parse time about...

Epic
sql-coverage

While the SQL `NOT IN` support added in #5992 seems to work correctly for the general case, according to SQL conventions, there should have been no rows returned here. ```...

sql-coverage

Consider: ``` $ super -c "SELECT;" error("missing") ``` Between the SQL standard, Postgres, and other SQL implementations, there's varying takes on how this should behave. ## Details Repro is with...

sql-coverage

Postgres has a [`generate_series` function](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-srf.html#FUNCTIONS-SRF) that's handy for use in testing. Users may appreciate having it for other reasons, so we may want to add it to SuperSQL. ``` $...

sql-coverage

This fails in SuperDB but works in Postgres. ``` $ super -version Version: 7f23f6560 $ super -c "SELECT * FROM (VALUES (NULL, NULL), (3, 4), (3, 7)) v1;" values clause...

sql-coverage

SQL subqueries come in several varieties, but as of super commit 7f23f65, we have yet to add support for even the simplest, e.g., ``` $ super -version Version: 7f23f6560 $...

sql-coverage

The following query currently fails in SuperDB but works in Postgres. ``` $ super -version Version: 7f23f6560 $ super -c "SELECT * FROM (VALUES (3), ('42')) v1;" values clause must...

sql-coverage

The following error message could likely be improved to something more like the one from Postgres. ``` $ super -version Version: 7f23f6560 $ super -c "SELECT * FROM (VALUES (1,...

sql-coverage