Yahor Siarheyenka
Yahor Siarheyenka
I found a better way to toast 🍞 against `zstd` support and added extra assertion 🥽
The issue with `br` compression level is solved ✅ As for the experimental status of `zstd`, if user gonna enable it manually, it kinda implies that user smart 🎓 enough...
I couldn't find any policy that mentioned anything about experimental features is not being allowed. The only reason why `zstd` has experimental status is bcos it was recently added to...
Meanwhile, [@fastify/compress](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@fastify/compress) & [hono-compress](https://www.npmjs.com/package/hono-compress) already have `zstd` support for months 🗓️
Pushed cure 🩹 for coverage. Hope it works 🙂
Rebased on `master` branch 🌿
What kind of maintenance work it may require? Coz, it seems that current algos ain't causing any work, at all 💤 Shall it wait until `zstd` gets "experimental" flag 🚩...
I'd also like to add that I'm trying to add 🧩 these features to the framework 🧰 not just bcos I personally need them, but bcos I believe it'll be...
IMO, we can withhold `zstd` from this PR, and I’ll make all necessary changes to address remaining issues. Alternatively, we could move compression 🗜️ entirely out of the core, into...
For "full out-of-the-box functionality" it will make more sense just to add missing algos into the core, bump min supported node version to `22.15.0`, and release new semver major. No...