Brian Richter

that would be great!

not yet unfortunately.. will ping @mikelodder7 and try to move on this over the holidays

Be careful with this `bitcoin-cli` command above as the bitcoin wallet isn't aware of inscriptions so will likely use them as fee.. Just lost 3 inscriptions to the miners this...

yeah i recommend not burning rares its a real bummer

yeah I think there is a chance. When I did it there was 4 ordinals that ended up moving and the one I was trying to bump was one of...

Would creating a send tx after the reveal with a high CPFP fee rate help an inscription get prioritized without increasing cost of inscription as much?

We are accomplishing this by having the entire inscription be a [Verifiable Credential](https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/). This allows the embedding of the image alongside metadata as well as adds the provenance of who...

Oops definitely accidentally duped this. Thanks for the catch!

I believe what you are decrypting and seeing here is the "forward" message for the routing protocol. Your encryption is wrapping the message with 2 layers and you are unwrapping...

hmm yeah, and looking closer your did:peer doesn't have routingKeys in it as I had assumed. Not sure what else to suggest.. will need feedback from sicpa folks