Brian J. Miller
Brian J. Miller
FWIW: https://github.com/TryxAPI/xapi-swagger
I suspect @bscSCORM is really the only one that can answer this, and some of that answer may just be the age of the spec and/or an arbitrary decision at...
FWIW, for a 2.x version I'd advocate dropping the alternate request syntax completely.
I can't tell if you are asking me whether I think the syntax is no longer needed or whether the LRS thinks the syntax is no longer needed. I was...
For clarity can you switch issue to be "UTC" rather than "UTF" :-).
I think the array approach would be more consistent with the rest of the spec. Note that URLs are going to get long, quickly. Your `1234` example is only partially...
I think the include voided flag is more inline with the stream nature of that resource and should work so long as a system isn't looking at a particular slice...
But it does say they are "invalid" so I wonder how you distinguish "contain errors" and "invalid". I'd question your use of voiding in that case, it sounds like you...
Adding LRS C doesn't matter because it will either ignore voiding statements for statements it doesn't have, or it won't have known about statements it never saw (and shouldn't because...
Always open to interpretation, but I would suggest it is not "just an array of strings". It could depend on whether the interaction type is being specified. In the case...